There’s a lot of excitement in the education sector about the need to equip students with skills like critical thinking, collaboration, and communication, to prepare them for a global, innovation-driven economy. But that’s easier said than done. Major changes are needed to move from a decades-old model towards creating new ways to educate students. Schools and their leaders, particularly in low-income contexts, often lack the necessary resources and support.

But given the right tools, school leaders can be the key to bringing this much-needed change to their schools. Knowing this, The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation partnered with IDEO and the Stanford d.school to create School Retool, a four-month-long professional development fellowship that trains principals to take a do-it-yourself approach to school change by conducting small, scrappy experiments called “hacks.”

The best part: They use the resources they already have available to address their schools’ needs now, without waiting for external funding or assistance. School Retool is available to principals at public schools where 60 percent or more of students qualify for free and reduced lunch, which is a common measure of poverty. The School Retool program provides research-based strategies for improving student outcomes, as well as training and one-on-one coaching on how to redesign school culture through easily achievable changes.

A Scaled Approach

School Retool addresses a common challenge in creating change across schools: Each school has its own people, culture, and needs, so programs need to be flexible. The fellowship helps school leaders define their aspirations, and provides them with inspiration through “Big Ideas” that have proven to be successful in different contexts in education. It then supports them to start small with hacks that help them learn how to implement these ideas in their own school. The program scales through regional cohorts of principals who learn from each other as they go through a process of setting goals, designing hacks, reflecting on the learning and progress, and making improvements to the next iteration.

Small Steps Toward Big Change

As School Retool has rolled out at schools across the country over the past two years, it’s becoming evident that small changes are adding up to major progress, and that the small hacks approach is helping leaders go from planning to doing. Take, for example, Marthaa Torres, the principal of a low-income San Francisco high school who started with a small experiment with one struggling student, trying to create a more personalized learning plan for him. “The hacking approach is a framework that will help me eventually get to the kind of school that I’m trying to create,” Torres said. To build on the learnings of her “hack,” she created and expanded a personalized coaching program for the student’s peer group of older Latino boys. Her goal is to roll out additional advisory support in the next school year. What started as a “hack” to give agency to a single student is beginning to affect the school-wide culture by incorporating student voice into decision making.

Creating a Movement

The School Retool fellowship launched in 2015 with a pilot for 16 principals from seven San Francisco Bay Area school districts, reaching more than 12,000 students. School Retool has since hosted cohorts for school leaders in Washington D.C., Detroit, Virginia, Idaho, and Colorado. By the end of 2016, 164 school leaders of over 114,000 students had participated in the fellowship program.

In addition to the in-depth work with school leaders, School Retool is creating a national dialogue around change in schools. Its first national effort drew more than 1,500 principals in the Shadow A Student Challenge, who spent a day walking in students’ shoes to build empathy and gain insight into their students’ school lives.

Learn more about how more school leaders are enacting change: bringing a sense of true belonging to a school’s culture; engaging students as active learners; hacking towards literacy; retooling for equity; and more.

WATCH: Marthaa Torres: Adopting a Hacking Mindset on Vimeo.

Remember your first View-Master? The sound and feel of that iconic camera-snapping motion, the excitement of seeing those vivid images in the form of your own personal slideshow? Introduced in 1939, this stereoscopic toy brought beautiful landscapes and famous attractions to the eyes of kids around the world.

Flash-forward more than 75 years, and the View-Master has been reincarnated to spark that same sense of wonder for the digital age. The redesigned model, the result of a project collaboration between IDEO and Mattel, is a modern case that bridges technology with play. The new View-Master preserves the classic features of the original toy, such as the original lever and wheel, but offers a much more immersive, 360-degree virtual experience.

Here’s how it works: Download the View-Master app and slide a smartphone into the sleek new red-and-white headset. From there, the phone’s camera will scan the QR codes on the reels to view a wide variety of images, such as wildlife, outer space, and a dinosaur landscape. Two slightly different images are displayed side by side on the device's screen. As each of your eyes looks at just the image directly in front of it and tries to reconcile it with what the other eye is seeing, a 3D effect is created. By moving your head around with the viewer over your eyes and taking advantage of the sensors within your phone to sense direction and position, you can travel through each of the scenes, exploring each of the different settings.

After working alongside Mattel to understand the heritage of the View-Master brand, researching the potential for VR and play, and exploring a variety of materials for the new device, designers created several prototypes that they tested with their core market: kids. As a result, the final design accounted for things like whether it could pass a drop-test or fit into kids’ hands.

Beyond the joy of pure play, the technology that powers the new View-Master also opens up a new world of possibilities for learning. Imagine turning a page in a textbook and seeing dinosaurs come to life. Or a virtual tour of an art museum through a set of View-Masters.

"We view this as just the beginning," said Doug Wadleigh, a Mattel executive, in an interview with CNET. "Obviously, we're getting in this space pretty early. The goal is to create the View-Master brand for the next 75 years."

Genentech is a biotech company that tackles difficult-to-treat medical conditions across the globe by creating innovative treatments. As a sponsor of the TED2012 conference, Genentech approached IDEO to partner in creating a “social space” for the TED exhibit hall that would captivate participants in an interactive brand experience and garner excitement around the future of personalized medicine.

To make leading-edge science more accessible to the masses, the team landed on an exciting new provocation: What if we could turn genes into music? IDEO worked closely with Genentech to develop an immersive genetic experiment that could incorporate traits of the TED community, using the company’s brand new technology for overnight gene analysis. A TED participant would choose a colorful trait pin packaged with a cheek swab kit and corresponding barcode, allowing them to leave a genetic sample one day and return the next day to discover that four SNPs of DNA had been analyzed overnight and translated into a unique musical track.

The IDEO team developed the concept, prototyped it with scientists, musicians, and sound engineers, and designed every element of the physical and digital experience—from the swab kit and packaging, to the built space and listening stations, iPad app, and other digital touchpoints. At the heart of the experience was music, including an algorithm that could generate 6500 unique musical combinations to reflect the genetic diversity of the TED participants.

Genentech’s “Infinite Variations” exhibit at TED2012 created the world’s first genetic symphony, an innovative and colorful blend of science and music. With the exhibit, Genentech sparked novel, approachable conversations about the role of genetics in medicine.

Of the 1850 attendees, over 1100 joined the genetic experiment in music and walked away with a new understanding of personalized science—and of their own genetic makeup.

What happens when you serve kids food made with cricket flour? And what do parents think? That’s what IDEO and Bitty Foods sought to learn during a collaboration to explore new kinds of lunchbox foods as a means to discover opportunities for alternative sources of protein.

We talked to Megan Miller, cofounder of Bitty, the Bay Area startup that makes delicious foods with cricket flour, about the collaboration.

Listen to the full audio story below, or go to Soundcloud.

For decades, women’s health has been underfunded, overlooked, and too often reduced to reproductive care. Medical research has been built around male bodies, while the complexity of women’s biology and lived experiences has been treated as a problem to simplify rather than an opportunity to understand.

Now, AI could change that. Designed intentionally, AI could unlock new kinds of evidence that close historical data gaps and inform better care. But if we aren’t careful, we could be scaling systems that were never designed for women and build the next generation of healthcare on the same broken foundations as the past.

The stakes are high. The opportunity is massive. This is where design matters most.

Introducing the Women’s Health × AI Exchange

We believe design can help us embrace AI’s healthcare possibilities while recognizing and mitigating its risks. And we believe the most promising futures are shaped collaboratively, by bringing different perspectives into conversation and making those possibilities tangible.

That’s why we’ve launched the Women’s Health * AI Exchange, an open, design-led exploration of one important question: How might AI meaningfully transform women’s health, and what would it take to ensure that it does?

To frame this exploration, we crafted six provocations about possible futures at the intersection of women’s health and AI. Futures where AI could:

• Reframe women’s biological complexity from a healthcare liability to a scientific asset and create new pathways for better care.
• Transform the relationship between healthcare professionals and patients, translating qualitative data into clinically actionable evidence.
• Connect the dots across a woman’s health journey to enable more proactive, preventive, and life-stage-specific care.
• Drive innovation in women’s longevity, helping researchers understand what most influences how women age.
• Flip the economics of clinical research, incentivizing exploration at the deprioritized edges and intersections.
• Put data back in women’s hands to help them find their own insights around issues where institutional research has not been prioritized.

Imagining what AI could do is only half the work. We also need to consider the shifts required to make these futures possible. And so, each of these provocations ends with the same challenge: What would it take to make them real? 

We’re inviting you into this conversation to help us collectively sharpen a point of view and co-design a landscape of opportunities. Here’s how to join.

Go to the Women’s Health x AI Exchange and choose a provocation that resonates with you. An AI facilitator will ask thoughtful follow-up questions to help you frame your point of view and articulate what you believe needs to change. Your thoughts will be posted anonymously. As more people participate, their contributions will help reveal where perspectives align, where tensions remain, and what new opportunities are emerging.

Turning tension into possibility

This conversation is just the beginning. We’ll synthesize themes and share emergent opportunities. We’ll bring together people across healthcare, research, technology, investment, and design to help us prioritize opportunities for further exploration. And we’ll translate the most compelling ideas into tangible prototypes that help people see, experience, and shape what desirable, viable, feasible, and responsible AI-enabled healthcare could look like.

We’re approaching this as an investigation in motion, not a finished thesis. Our intention is to work openly so the perspectives, provocations, and possibilities we generate can inspire and inform the people already working to move women’s health forward.

And while women’s health is at the center of this exploration, the conversation we want to have is even bigger. It is a conversation about the future of healthcare data and power. A conversation about how AI might help close the gaps that decades of underfunding have left behind, and what we can all do to ensure it does.

Whether you’re a clinician, researcher, technologist, entrepreneur, investor, designer, or simply someone who cares about the future of healthcare, we invite you to help us reimagine what healthcare could be, for everyone.

Explore the Women’s Health * AI Exchange and add your perspective.

‍

‍

AI is transforming healthcare at a remarkable pace. But our understanding of women’s health has a lot of catching up to do.

During a recent meeting with a pharma client, we played a YouTube video of GLP-1 users that left the team slack-jawed. Sitting around a conference table, they watched people crack open an auto-injector and pour the contents into a vial so they could titrate out a more precise dose of the drug themselves. They heard several patients admit to using a family member’s prescription because they didn’t have their own. Others lamented that they weren’t in range for their preferred direct-to-consumer delivery platform. The realization was stark: patients knew what they wanted from their GLP-1s, and if the manufacturer didn’t provide it, they would find a way to make it themselves. In that moment, this particular pharma company understood it was not at all prepared for a future where patient expectations would remake the drug market. 

The introduction of Ozempic and new access models for GLP-1s like Lilly Direct and Hims & Hers have fundamentally shifted the pharmaceutical industry in the last five years, unleashing more self-directed therapy journeys and a new kind of healthcare consumer. Patient expectations about what pharma companies can do—and the experiences available to them in a healthcare setting—have been completely rewritten. This revolution is making traditional pharma commercialization processes that push patients and providers through a few preferred channels a thing of the past. Especially as consumer-facing startups come for their market share—and create an even larger pie.  

If pharma companies are going to meet this new wave of consumer expectations for everything from GLP-1s to hair loss and erectile dysfunction medicines, supplements to fertility drugs, they need to prioritize designing exceptional experiences that come along with their therapies. That requires building an entirely new set of skills and behaviors that can support product pipelines. Here are four crucial steps to get there.

1. Uncover the needs patients want pharmaceuticals to meet

Pharma companies need to do research with real patients to get a clear view of the full therapy journey—from diagnosis to long-term use. In that process, they can identify the highest-risk moments, like confusion over instructions, frustration over delivery methods, and potential misuse, and prioritize opportunities to improve real-world adoption and adherence. 

Lilly understood this early on. In the 1990s and early 2000s, the pharma company had several new, life-changing medications and two big challenges: Its primary drug—insulin—had to be self-injected, which patients were hesitant to do. And its drug-delivery device platform lagged behind the needs of insulin users.

Lilly approached us to design the next-generation auto-injector platform. Early in the partnership, a team of IDEO designers and Lilly leaders met with diabetes patients around the globe to better understand how they lived with the disease. They quickly realized there was a need for a device that met the needs of a broad range of dexterity-challenged and injection site-specific patient populations (including rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis patients). As the development of multiple candidate molecules was still underway, the team focused on creating an injection experience that would work for these more challenging patient populations, knowing that a design that worked for them would also deliver a better experience for a broader swath of future users. 

While we carefully considered every feature of the autoinjector itself (from grippy labels and a stable, twist-off base to large, clear unlock tabs and injection buttons), we also designed packaging that fit in a standard-sized refrigerator, created a set of highly visual instructions, and took into account the involvement and support of family members and caregivers. 

Fast forward to 2026, and Lilly is still leveraging the design we made together to not only support pre-diabetes treatments like Trulicity, but also psoriasis therapies like Taltz, migraine therapies like Emgaility, and GLP-1 molecules like Mounjaro and Zepbound. The latter accounted for the majority of the company’s annual revenue in 2025. Taking the time to create a comprehensive drug delivery experience has yielded an invaluable delivery toolkit that Lilly and the patients they serve still benefit from today.

2. Design the experience around the therapy

As more and more pharma companies create consumer-style experiences, it’s crucial they build services and tools that support onboarding, adherence, and ongoing use. Standing out is no longer just about drug efficacy. It’s about how well patients with all kinds of needs and circumstances can access and adhere to the therapy—and how well pharma companies can deliver against their competitors. 

When Sanofi launched Beyfortus, the first-ever RSV immunization for newborns, in 2024, it was a milestone in the fight against the virus, which had resulted in the death of 445,000 babies worldwide in 2019 alone. But the company knew that growing anti-vaccine sentiment might prevent parents from giving their children the potentially life-saving immunization. 

Together, we conducted research with parents, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and healthcare administrators in Germany, Spain, China, and the US to identify barriers to adoption across cultures. The team quickly discovered that no single approach would work across Sanofi’s 20-plus international markets. Training for medical professionals needed to be flexible and customizable. They also discovered that discussing immunizations right after a baby was born was too stressful for new parents.  

Ultimately, the team created an accessible global communication toolkit with straightforward language, metaphors, and illustrations to support informed conversations between providers and parents before and after a child is born. Then they held a series of market-fit co-design workshops to make the tools more resonant with regional customers and ensure compliance with local regulations.

In its first year on the market, Beyfortus became a $1.8 billion therapy, and more than six million babies have been immunized. 

With a growing funnel of information about drugs, therapies, and even supplements, pharma companies must cut through the noise to support patient understanding and adherence. 

3. Define how you show up beyond the drug

To have an even greater impact on patient outcomes, pharmaceutical companies should explore new roles, partnerships, and models. That could mean creating new offerings that combine a given therapy with support and services, building partnerships with payers, employers, or platforms to extend reach, or creating models that tie therapies to long-term outcomes and value.

Japanese pharmaceutical company Otsuka is perhaps one of the most diversified pharma organizations in the industry, focusing on above-molecule interventions including companion diagnostics, digital technologies, and other tools that enhance the effectiveness of chemical or biological treatments. With a business that spans traditional drug development and manufacturing, digital solutions, and even consumer products such as Pocari Sweat, an electrolyte drink, Otsuka has bet that diversity and go-to-market pathways will lead to better experiences for patients. Not to mention these touchpoints also provide deep insights into the needs of the people Otsuka serves. 

In 2018, Otsuka joined forces with Click Therapeutics to develop digital health services to accompany one of its leading medications, aripiprazole. The antipsychotic is used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder (MDD). By 2024, the company had developed an app featuring activities aimed at treating MDD. The partners chose a challenging but potentially impactful area for their pilot program: four primary care sites within the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK with a high caseload of MDD patients, where a digital solution combined with antidepressants could significantly reduce the burden on these sites.

Depression is widespread across the UK, and the treatment demands on the NHS are considerable. However, the system lacks the resources to provide every patient with the necessary services to treat their conditions. This digital companion to antidepressant medication aims to improve treatment effectiveness, and if the pilot is successful, it could significantly ease strain on the NHS while helping patients achieve better outcomes. 

4. Create a human-centered R&D pipeline

Creating more human-centered packaging or instructions to help people better understand a drug is an effective step forward, but exploring new internal capabilities that make your innovation pipeline more future-fit and human-centered can be transformative. 

That work can take many forms: building a beacon project that upskills product and team leadership on methods to better understand the decisions consumers are making today and in the future, introducing futures-thinking to help your team look beyond the next five years, or reinforcing purpose and culture to empower employees to make patient-centered decisions. 

In 2020, as Moderna raced to deliver a COVID-19 vaccine during the pandemic, the company needed to grow exponentially—and rapidly. However, by hiring employees from traditional pharma giants, it risked losing the unique entrepreneurial culture that made it successful in the first place—one that embraced speed and accepted risk. This shift could have limited its future ambitions of developing breakthrough products to combat other viruses and diseases, and even cancer. 

Together, we worked to codify the company’s culture and values into a set of Mindsets that would empower employees to move quickly, evaluate risk, and make the right decisions. The team met with Moderna veterans to gather stories about key cultural moments, like when a crucial piece of equipment didn’t fit in the door, and employees knocked down the wall to keep vaccine production moving. Insights from these stories became Mindsets, like “Act with urgency: Action today compounds the lives saved tomorrow” and “We behave like owners: The solutions we’re building go beyond any job description,” that were then tested with new hires, employee resource groups, and others across the company.

The Mindsets were more than a tagline: they set the stage for continued progress and future breakthroughs. Today, Moderna is working with Merck on a cancer vaccine that just completed a successful Phase 3 clinical trial.  

This sea change in consumer expectations for medicines and therapies can feel disorienting for traditional pharma companies—but it also offers enormous opportunities for those that think outside tried-and-true drug delivery channels and embrace human-centered design. By truly understanding patient needs, finding new and inventive ways to support them, and building the capabilities to empower your people to create a human-centered R&D pipeline, organizations can distinguish themselves in the market. These behaviors can not only drive the market, but more importantly, radically improve patient outcomes. 

“This sea change in consumer expectations for medicines and therapies can feel disorienting for traditional pharma companies—but it also offers enormous opportunities for those that think outside tried-and-true drug delivery channels and embrace human-centered design."

A pioneer of human-centered design at IDEO, Jane Fulton Suri joined one of IDEO's predecessor firms, ID Two, in 1987. With a background in psychology and architecture, she gained early experience as a researcher at the renowned former Institute for Consumer Ergonomics at Loughborough University of Technology. At ID Two, and later at IDEO, Suri introduced social science principles to the design industry, which had not yet fully embraced them. Her contributions would go on to reshape the field.

Suri’s influential 2005 book, Thoughtless Acts?: Observations on Intuitive Design, features a collection of snapshots that highlight the subtle, instinctual ways people interact with the everyday world. It’s a love letter to observation as a design discipline with real-world impact. Her work in human factors at IDEO has influenced products people use every day, from rubber grips on Oral-B toothbrushes to redesigned Evenflo strollers. In recent years, she’s expanded her focus beyond human-centered design to explore how patterns found in nature and living systems can inspire more sustainable solutions—what she calls life-centered design.

Now a Partner Emerita, we were so glad to welcome Jane back to IDEO earlier this year for a conversation with our design community. 

Mike Peng (MP): If you don’t mind, Jane, tell us about your origin story and how you came to IDEO. 

Jane Fulton Suri (JFS): I started out in psychology because I was really interested in people. And then I got really interested in people in the everyday world. I brought that mindset into design: Let’s get out there and see what people really do. 

I found myself working with manufacturers to help them understand why people didn’t do what they expected them to with power tools, motorcycles, and other dangerous things. A lot of my work was mitigating disaster. And I thought, this is crazy. Why aren’t these conversations happening while things are being designed? Problems are easier to remedy at the design stage than when they’re on the market.

Then I met Bill Moggridge, one of IDEO’s three cofounders, because a friend of mine was his client. He was a myth and a legend. After our conversation, he asked me, “What do you want to do now?” And I said, “I’d like you to offer me a job!”—which was very, very uncharacteristic of me. I had no clue what I was getting into.

I quickly realized I needed to understand what my teammates were doing and value that, then add ideas about going out, meeting people, and watching what they do.

So instead of having the answer, I realized the point was about discovering together how to make the design brief better. That became the practice—getting away from the desk. And now that means teams getting away from their screens and going into the world together.

MP: Now user research and ethnography are common practice in design. What were the early days like?

JFS: When we started out, we had no budget for anything I wanted to do. I had to convince my colleagues it would be exciting and interesting, and that we’d have good stories to tell our clients. Then it became a bit of a sales story about why it might take an extra week or two, or even a month, to do the project.

What we were doing was more like exploration; we didn’t know what we'd find, and afterward, we would probably want to do something different from what we’d promised when we wrote our proposal. 

MP: If you had to sum up a few of your most memorable projects while you were at IDEO, what are some of the ones that really stood out to you?

JFS: Early on, Supercuts invited us to bid on an innovation-focused job. At the time, we were essentially a product design company. David Kelley, Tom Kelley, and others weren’t sure what we might do for a company like Supercuts.

So with one of the other early human factors researchers, we went out and got haircuts. Then we went around the city just looking at different hair stylists’ establishments. We started putting together a story of how customers make decisions from the moment they think about wanting a haircut to deciding where to go, making their first appointment, then all the behaviors that follow, like primping a bit before you leave the shop. 

We had a lot of fun engineering this great crazy clipper. But I always believed our best ideas were these little moments throughout the experience, like getting a cape that made you look good, or a mirror that said “Supercuts” so you’d remember where you were. That was our first customer journey map.

MP: Are there other memorable moments that really stick out to you?

JFS: One of the most moving ones for me was at IDEO Chicago, years and years and years ago, when colleagues of mine were working on the LifePort Kidney Transporter. The project was all about how precious a kidney is. The team described their experience in the operating theater, seeing the surgeon take this living element and cup it so gently, like a baby bird, as he transferred it to where he needed to place it. That recalibrated the team’s thinking about designing the carrying system, because we’d just been thinking about it functionally and mechanically. But it also let them tap into what it really means to design for a living passenger. 

MP: Let’s dive into the craft of design research. How do you know when a research insight is truly great?

JFS: Insight, for me, is a change of state in our understanding. There's an epiphany of sorts, a new recognition. You get an insight by being a sensory human being, observant and absorbent through all your senses…and then discovering you are excited about something new. Design and innovation take a lot of personal energy. That human emotion has to come from you.

And that’s what happens when clients get really drawn into ideas, too—they feel you’re changing the way they see things. 

MP: What fundamentals do we need to continue to embrace to do research well?

JFS: Nothing beats being an aware, sensory human being who is curious about other people, places, and things. Research doesn’t have to be expensive. Even a conversation with one interesting person, or exposure to an unfamiliar place, will do.

Sometimes we're reluctant to put something in front of the client that we think is a really cool idea, but nobody has said they wanted it. Perhaps the research didn’t show that it was a really good idea yet. But sometimes we have to have conviction about our own perspectives and the confidence to share innovative ideas, even without hard evidence. I’ve always felt that. 

MP: One of the most important phases of IDEO’s design-thinking process is synthesis—taking the messy materials we’ve gathered during research and making sense of them. How do you approach synthesis?

JFS: I once wrote a piece about how what happens in the design process isn't the same as how we formally describe it. One story stands out. I call it “the black shoes.”
‍

‍Annette Diefenthaler, now Professor and Executive Director of the Munich Design Institute, was an IDEO researcher working with a global bank trying to set up a presence in Russia. The team had done loads and loads of interviews with people about banks. Late one night, on the way back to their hotel, Annette saw a big shopping center. She asked the driver to stop, because she realized they'd had no time, other than doing their interviews, to absorb much about the culture.

So she went into this big mall, and Annette was stunned by how simply the department store had arranged its products. One wall was just black shoes all lined up, all the different kinds of black shoes you could have. It was all really obvious and not very exciting because there were only black shoes—no glitz at all.

What she took from that was: this is a culture where trust is built by showing what there is. It was so honest and direct. And here we were, talking to all these people about banks and trying to understand how to build trust in an alien brand. She had a flash of insight that suddenly made sense of what the team had been hearing. The bank needed to be so much more straightforward and transparent about its services. “Black shoes” became a mantra for that project and shaped how they designed the bank’s interior and described its offer.

This insight came from a moment that was completely off script. I love that. You can’t always get to an insight by staring at your interview notes. You get it because it’s somehow gotten into your viscera.

MP: Are there any moments where you found creative ways to present research to clients to help them make decisions?

JFS: Instead of personas and customer descriptions, a team once created a series of packed suitcases that represented the different types of travelers they interviewed. The client loved that one.

MP: How do you find the courage to decide to deliver an installation of suitcases instead of a more traditional research deliverable, like a presentation?

JFS: You need to tune in to what your client needs to absorb and what you want to communicate, and be ready to experiment with how you do that. You need to get good at failing. You try things, fail, and learn how to gauge what might work better the next time. 

MP: You’re an incredible artist—I’ve seen your woodblock prints. You’re also an amazing rock climber and swimmer. I’m curious how these activities helped you develop your craft as a researcher and a designer.

JFS: There’s something very elemental about all of them—they’re direct experiences of the world. You give your weight over to the rock. You trust the water. Even with woodblock printing, what I love is how material it is. I use sharp knives and gouges to carve the wood, then I learn how much water and ink to use and how the brushes work. 

That’s the thing I find really exciting. The fact that human beings have evolved to make beautiful things, that connection of making and place is a crucial motivator.

MP: You are one of the authors of the first edition of The Little Book of Design Research Ethics. I’d love to hear your perspective on the ethics of the discipline, and what we should keep in mind as we increasingly rely on technology. 

JFS:  I have a problem with the term research, partly because I think it connotes things like clipboards and taking notes—that we’re documenting other people’s lives. I’m happier when it all feels more like co-discovery, exploring together. We are together, engaged in this space, noticing things about your behavior as well as what I’m thinking about your behavior. And it's more collaborative.

 Co-discovering with other humans is a much nicer place to be.

MP: Looking back, knowing what you know, what advice would you give young Jane? 

JFS: I think I had imposter syndrome for about five years or so. I could have moved along a lot faster if I’d had a little bit more confidence and maybe a few more people telling me that it was okay. 

MP: Are there any insights from your human factors work that you apply to the broader scope of life-centered design, and how we can learn from that?

JFS: A human being is a living thing in a living system of other living things. Observation and curiosity are key—we should keep asking the same kinds of questions about the inherent behavior of those systems, as we would ask about people: what they really do, what motivates them, and how we can gain insights from them. This goes back to your question about how rock climbing, swimming, and art come into it, in the sense that we can think more broadly about the elements that matter to people. There’s a whole living world out there with great examples of elegant systems we can learn from.

‍

This Q&A has been edited for length and clarity. 

‍

“Insight, for me, is a change of state in our understanding. There's an epiphany of sorts, a new recognition. You get an insight by being a sensory human being, observant and absorbent through all your senses."

When category-defining challenges like disruption, the accelerating pace of change, and the need to rethink how organizations work are on the table, looking back on the current year and fighting for the same budget won't work. That's why many of the leaders we partner with are massively rethinking their priorities and where to best focus their resources. 

It’s a lot to balance, but the process doesn’t have to feel like guesswork. For several years, we’ve been using a tool we call the Planning Canvas, which provides a clear, strategic, and uncomplicated way to reflect on what has changed, what you’ve learned, and what matters now before planning for the coming year. It’s a simple way to help you evaluate where you are, and what levers you might pull to get your organization where you want it to be.

Download the Canvas

Our 2027 Planning Canvas walks you through three effective steps: 

1. Reflect on what’s changed
2. Imagine the impact you want to have in the near future
3. Decide what to double down on, reform, let go of or pursue as a new bet

We recommend using it for individual reflection ahead of annual planning, before team sessions and leadership decision meetings begin. It will help you arrive with a clear point of view on what has changed, what matters now, and the choices worth putting on the table. At the same time, don’t hesitate to adapt it to your needs. If facilitating a collaborative conversation across your team aligns better with your organization's culture, this tool can help with that, too.

The goal isn’t to predict the year ahead perfectly. It’s to enter planning conversations with a sharper point of view and the confidence to make impactful choices together. We hope you find it useful. 

Looking for more help with strategic challenges? Get in touch. We’d love to connect.

‍

At a time when uncertainty feels like a constant, leaders across categories can find it tough to make confident planning decisions for the year ahead.

As an IDEO Partner and Executive Director, I work with the food & beverage and CPG industry to find growth opportunities that create climate-positive impact in the world. My work includes launching new offers, creating strategic visions, and building innovation capabilities. I leverage my industrial design training and creativity to find growth opportunities for clients like Suntory, Alicorp, San Francisco Unified School District, Northern Illinois Food Bank, and Plum Organics.

I am an expert in understanding people’s deeply-rooted food behaviors and food systems challenges like food insecurity and food waste.

I have spoken on these topics and more at TedX, SXSW, and Feeding America.

I am a graduate of California College of the Arts, with a BFA in Industrial Design. I received a BA in English from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and worked as a New York-based print and online journalist. In my free time, I enjoy canning tomatoes and family hikes.

This is the question I have consistently asked throughout my design career. Today, that takes me to some edges of IDEO’s design practice that include Climate Era design, open and collective systems, designing strategy, and creative leadership.

Through writing, speaking, and advising, I try to champion the interdisciplinary, multi-faceted nature of design.

I am proud of our progress in applying design thinking to topics such as service design, system design and strategy, and across sectors such as education, health, government, technology, the social sector, and business. I frequently speak about the value of design thinking, creative leadership, and innovation to business leaders and designers around the world, and have participated in the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

My talks "Serious Play" and "Change by Design" appear on TED.com. My book on how design thinking transforms organizations, Change by Design, was released by Harper Business in September 2009, and revised and updated in 2019.

I work with creative leaders and executives to design new offerings, drive business growth, and transform their culture through the power of design. After almost two decades of working with clients like Ford, Samsung, and Walgreens, I believe that successful change doesn't come from a “big idea,” but rather teams looking at problems from new perspectives, challenging deeply held assumptions, and working together in new ways.

An engineer and designer at heart, I am passionate about designing tangible solutions that address critical challenges and change how people work, but my happiest times at IDEO are when I’m building a prototype in our shop.

Prior to joining IDEO, I played with little red wagons as a product design engineer at Radio Flyer. I hold a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and a B.A. in Industrial Design from the University of Notre Dame.

I lead strategy for IDEO’s learning and media and partnership initiatives, including IDEO U, the learning arm of IDEO where people can learn the skills of design thinking and mindsets of creative leadership. In my role, I’m focused on finding new, customer-focused, tech-supported ways to deliver IDEO’s long-standing value proposition to more people around the world.

My specialty is helping iconic brands undergo major transformations and become competitive market leaders.

Throughout my career, I’ve led strategy and operations at respected media and content companies, including The New York Times, The Economist, and OgilvyOne. I also have an extensive background in product management and innovation from my time at Gartner, Inc, where I served as Group Vice President in Global Product Management. I am experienced in launching new product offers, developing and leading teams, and driving cultural and operational change. I hold a master’s degree in Journalism from New York University and I speak six languages.